I admit it freely: I do not understand what the hell this comment piece is trying to say.
But unfettered criticism of human rights could also have have certain pitfalls. In a context where the movement remains marginal to power, it could inhibit progress and demoralise those working within the framework.
Any takers, then? I’d welcome an interpretation that makes more sense than my own Labradoresque cocked-head puzzlement.
P.S. Is it indicative of other readers’ bafflement that, although this was posted on CiF yesterday morning, only one person has commented?