<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nef proposes 21-hour work week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bellagerens.com/2010/02/18/nef-proposes-21-hour-work-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/02/18/nef-proposes-21-hour-work-week/</link>
	<description>inde vides agilem bella gerentem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:13:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellagerens</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/02/18/nef-proposes-21-hour-work-week/comment-page-1/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>bellagerens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=955#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>If you read the comments on the article, you&#039;ll notice a fair few people damning the capitalist pig-dogs for demanding that they &lt;i&gt;work&lt;/i&gt; in return for their wages, and for insisting on having one person do the job for 40 hours a week instead of two people doing it for 20 hours apiece.

This, after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1be19256-1b64-11df-838f-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a report released two days ago&lt;/a&gt; showed that &quot;About 2.8m people, almost a tenth of the UK workforce, are &quot;underemployed&quot; - working fewer hours than they would like because the work is not there.&quot;

I propose that all those people who feel they&#039;re working too much exchange jobs with those who feel they&#039;re working too little. Then we can talk about whether the working week is a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read the comments on the article, you&#8217;ll notice a fair few people damning the capitalist pig-dogs for demanding that they <i>work</i> in return for their wages, and for insisting on having one person do the job for 40 hours a week instead of two people doing it for 20 hours apiece.</p>
<p>This, after <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1be19256-1b64-11df-838f-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1" rel="nofollow">a report released two days ago</a> showed that &#8220;About 2.8m people, almost a tenth of the UK workforce, are &#8220;underemployed&#8221; &#8211; working fewer hours than they would like because the work is not there.&#8221;</p>
<p>I propose that all those people who feel they&#8217;re working too much exchange jobs with those who feel they&#8217;re working too little. Then we can talk about whether the working week is a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrothgar</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/02/18/nef-proposes-21-hour-work-week/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Hrothgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=955#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing how stupid the enemy is. We should be winning, shouldn&#039;t we? What gives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how stupid the enemy is. We should be winning, shouldn&#8217;t we? What gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

