<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kings and Queens and Catholics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/</link>
	<description>inde vides agilem bella gerentem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jester</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=909#comment-1607</guid>
		<description>&quot;Surely there are better uses for Evan Harris MP’s time.&quot;

Sadly, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Surely there are better uses for Evan Harris MP’s time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: berenike</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>berenike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=909#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>well said that woman.

I vaguely remember some other historian boozily expounding on the fact that about 53 people were skipped over at one point in order to avoid Catholics :) 

Irritating as Harris&#039;s smuggery is, I am with Hrothgar on this one. At least Harris not planning something actually evil and warped this time. 

signed

a female papist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well said that woman.</p>
<p>I vaguely remember some other historian boozily expounding on the fact that about 53 people were skipped over at one point in order to avoid Catholics :) </p>
<p>Irritating as Harris&#8217;s smuggery is, I am with Hrothgar on this one. At least Harris not planning something actually evil and warped this time. </p>
<p>signed</p>
<p>a female papist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellagerens</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>bellagerens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=909#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>Word. I guess the MP for Windsor &amp; Maidenhead (the fabulous and helpful Adam Afriyie) has more constructive things to do with himself than worrying about discrimination against the two women and as-yet-unknown number of Catholics the Act of Settlement might one day conceivably affect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word. I guess the MP for Windsor &amp; Maidenhead (the fabulous and helpful Adam Afriyie) has more constructive things to do with himself than worrying about discrimination against the two women and as-yet-unknown number of Catholics the Act of Settlement might one day conceivably affect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: English Pensioner</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>English Pensioner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=909#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>Why are people always complaining on behalf of someone else, particularly, when they haven&#039;t asked. As far as I know, nobody in the Royal Family has complained, and I&#039;m sure that they would be capable of raising the issue themselves if they felt aggrieved. Why doesn&#039;t this twit try to do something useful on behalf of his constituents and leave it to the MP for Maidenhead &amp; Windsor if necessary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are people always complaining on behalf of someone else, particularly, when they haven&#8217;t asked. As far as I know, nobody in the Royal Family has complained, and I&#8217;m sure that they would be capable of raising the issue themselves if they felt aggrieved. Why doesn&#8217;t this twit try to do something useful on behalf of his constituents and leave it to the MP for Maidenhead &amp; Windsor if necessary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CC Truckston</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>CC Truckston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=909#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>Hrothgar has a good point. Likely he would advocate, short of clearing out Congress altogether, finding some useless and harmless diversion upon which they could fixate, and thus spare America any more distress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrothgar has a good point. Likely he would advocate, short of clearing out Congress altogether, finding some useless and harmless diversion upon which they could fixate, and thus spare America any more distress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrothgar</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>Hrothgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=909#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>I like these historical blawg-entries. However, I feel I should point out that there is no better use of the MP&#039;s time. If he weren&#039;t dicking around with the royal family, he&#039;d be free to fuck up something that actually matters. Count your blessings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like these historical blawg-entries. However, I feel I should point out that there is no better use of the MP&#8217;s time. If he weren&#8217;t dicking around with the royal family, he&#8217;d be free to fuck up something that actually matters. Count your blessings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backofanenvelope</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Backofanenvelope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=909#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>I look thru&#039; about ten poliblogs every morning.  This is the only interesting one this week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look thru&#8217; about ten poliblogs every morning.  This is the only interesting one this week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellagerens</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>bellagerens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=909#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>Ah, quite right. Shall change it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, quite right. Shall change it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Timms</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2010/01/23/royalty-and-catholics/comment-page-1/#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Timms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=909#comment-1507</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a little pedantic of me but your tenses in &#039; had had no brother&#039; imply that you are unaware that Henry VIII had an elder brother, albeit one who pre-deceased their father Henry VII.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a little pedantic of me but your tenses in &#8216; had had no brother&#8217; imply that you are unaware that Henry VIII had an elder brother, albeit one who pre-deceased their father Henry VII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

