<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simplistic minimum-wage experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bellagerens.com/2009/10/05/simplistic-minimum-wage-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bellagerens.com/2009/10/05/simplistic-minimum-wage-experiment/</link>
	<description>inde vides agilem bella gerentem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:08:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2009/10/05/simplistic-minimum-wage-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=489#comment-804</guid>
		<description>not sure if ive calculated it correctly but 5.80 wage leads to about a 12 grand a year income.

anyone earning that wage who has a family would be entitled to a variety of benefits, working tax credits, child tax credits, council tax rebate, all of those benefits obviously come from the state via the taxpayer. and to me it looks like those who earn more pay to support those earning less and while in the case you illustrate is a small business which may go bust if it had to pay a living wage to it&#039;s workers, many big business earn simply millions for their stakeholders leaving the government to shuffle money from peter to paul (and creaming a bit off for themselves in the process). 
i&#039;m wondering how liberatarianism would address this. i&#039;ve read many advocate getting rid of taxes altogether and i can&#039;t see how that would address the problem of the very many people who work but simply aren&#039;t paid enough to live on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure if ive calculated it correctly but 5.80 wage leads to about a 12 grand a year income.</p>
<p>anyone earning that wage who has a family would be entitled to a variety of benefits, working tax credits, child tax credits, council tax rebate, all of those benefits obviously come from the state via the taxpayer. and to me it looks like those who earn more pay to support those earning less and while in the case you illustrate is a small business which may go bust if it had to pay a living wage to it&#8217;s workers, many big business earn simply millions for their stakeholders leaving the government to shuffle money from peter to paul (and creaming a bit off for themselves in the process).<br />
i&#8217;m wondering how liberatarianism would address this. i&#8217;ve read many advocate getting rid of taxes altogether and i can&#8217;t see how that would address the problem of the very many people who work but simply aren&#8217;t paid enough to live on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hungry Horace</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2009/10/05/simplistic-minimum-wage-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Hungry Horace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=489#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Maybe the minimum wage will be good for employees in the long run, since employers will invest in more machinery and their work will be more productive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the minimum wage will be good for employees in the long run, since employers will invest in more machinery and their work will be more productive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellagerens</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2009/10/05/simplistic-minimum-wage-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>bellagerens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=489#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Will do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2009/10/05/simplistic-minimum-wage-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=489#comment-591</guid>
		<description>And now I see what you mean, having read DK&#039;s post as well. Didn&#039;t get the context of your post, it could have done with a reference to Kezia Dugdale&#039;s living wage idiocy :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now I see what you mean, having read DK&#8217;s post as well. Didn&#8217;t get the context of your post, it could have done with a reference to Kezia Dugdale&#8217;s living wage idiocy :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellagerens</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2009/10/05/simplistic-minimum-wage-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>bellagerens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=489#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Quite. &#039;Employ fewer people.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite. &#8216;Employ fewer people.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://bellagerens.com/2009/10/05/simplistic-minimum-wage-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellagerens.com/?p=489#comment-589</guid>
		<description>But with 100 minimum wage employees working at minimum wage efficiency, you&#039;re running a horrendously inefficient operation. Employ fewer people at a higher wage and you won&#039;t be affected by changes in the minimum wage, and you&#039;ll get the same level of output.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But with 100 minimum wage employees working at minimum wage efficiency, you&#8217;re running a horrendously inefficient operation. Employ fewer people at a higher wage and you won&#8217;t be affected by changes in the minimum wage, and you&#8217;ll get the same level of output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
