Or, in this particular case, to call rape rape. Instead, they provide this headline:
“Afghan ‘anti-rape’ women attacked”
Elsewhere we find:
“Afghan women protest against ‘rape’”
Why the quotation marks, eh? Are these women protesting against something they consider rape, but the BBC doesn’t agree with that nomenclature? Let’s find out.
Dozens of Afghan women who tried to protest against a new law they say legalises rape within marriage have been attacked in the capital, Kabul.
Its most controversial article says a woman must make herself available for sex with her husband when he desires.
The law’s defenders say it actually protects the rights of women.
Aides to President Karzai insist that the law in fact provides more protection for women.
The counter-demonstrators – who support the new law – insist that the legislation stops women from being harmed.
“Muslim women have rights which are stated for them in the Koran, not rights that other countries set for them. We want the rights which have been set according to Islam,” one of them told the BBC.
Among the law’s provisions are that
• wives are obliged to have sexual relations with their husbands at least once every four days
• women cannot leave home without their husband’s permission
Critics say the law limits the rights of women from the Shia minority and authorises rape within marriage.
The law covers members of Afghanistan’s Shia minority, who make up 10% of the population. A separate family law for the Sunni majority is also being drawn up.
Although the BBC acknowledges that this crazy Afghan law obliges women to have sex with their husbands at least once every four days, whether the women want to or not, this still apparently does not count as rape, because some other nebulous crazy Afghans say that, actually quite the reverse, this law protects women and their rights!
Their right to be pronged once every four days at someone else’s convenience, apparently. But, says the BBC, that’s not rape. It’s ‘rape.’ Be told.